Wind Energy, Onshore Case—Business Development Issues14 Apr

Massachusetts’s Goal

In January 2009, Gov. Deval Patrick set a goal of developing 2,000 megawatts (MW) of wind power capacity, enough to power 800,000 Massachusetts homes, by 2020. This post addresses unrealistic expectations of that goal in terms of onshore wind turbines. Please see the post of April 5 for other onshore wind energy issues. (The offshore case is treated in separate posts.)

Business Development Issues

At best, electricity generation from onshore wind will be a small fraction of the total electricity generated in Massachusetts and will power only 17 percent of the consumers claimed (see “Wind Energy, Onshore Case—Wind Turbine Growth and Homes Powered by Homes in Massachusetts“). The anticipated rate at which wind turbines will be installed between 2010 and 2020 is probably not realistic. Unless the capital cost of onshore wind turbines decreases significantly, Massachusetts may feel compelled to support this industry beyond current expectations. If the economy does not improve, this economic assistance may be problematic.

Further, the life expectancy of wind turbines is 20 to 25 years. They will have to be either decommissioned, replaced with new wind turbines, or refurbished with subsystems (such as, overly stressed gearboxes from wind gusts), and thus incur costs that may have been ignored by policy analysts.

In the future, the cost of wind energy may seem less expensive compared to, say, coal when the heretofore unpaid costs of coal are factored into its price. These costs include climate change, air pollution, water shortage, wastewater, soil pollution, and land degradation.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

About Dr. Everson

Prior to forming this SBIR consultant practice, Dr. Jeffrey Everson was director of business development for QinetiQ North America’s Technology Solutions Group (previously Foster-Miller, Inc.).

Dr. Everson has won and been the principal investigator for several SBIR programs, including a Phase I program for NASA, a Phase I project for the U.S. Air Force, and Phase I and II contracts from the U.S. Department of Transportation. For the Phase II program, he received a Tibbetts Award for exemplifying the best in SBIR achievement.

Previously Dr. Everson held senior scientist positions at Battelle Memorial Institute, The Analytic Sciences Corporation (TASC), Honeywell Electro Optics Systems Division, and Itek Optical Systems Division.

He holds a PhD in physics from Boston College and a MS/BS in physics from Northeastern University.


For more information about how JHEverson Consulting can help your company with its SBIR and STTR proposals, please contact Jeff Everson.

JHEverson Consulting is based in the Boston area but consults for clients throughout North America. It also is supported by affiliated consultants.