Questions about the American-Russian Arctic Oil Deal01 Sep

My recent blog post (1) summarized the American-Russian Arctic oil deal. This post raises questions about this arrangement that are generally ignored by the mainline media.

  1. Total recoverable oil reserves in the Arctic Kara Sea are estimated at 110 billion barrels of oil, four times more that ExxonMobil’s entire reserves. In a previous post (2), I wrote that national oil companies (e.g., Saudi Aramco, Rosneft, etc. ) own approximately 95 percent of the world’s oil reserves, in contrast to international oil companies (ExxonMobil, BP, etc.) that control the remaining 5 percent. Further, oil production in the United States has been declining for years (3). Does it really make sense for the United States and ExxonMobil to depend on Russian oil or is it too late to worry about that?
  2. The Russian oil company, Rosneft, will receive equity in exploration projects located in Texas and the Gulf of Mexico. How much oil do the Russians expect to produce from these U.S. fields that are declining in production, especially when the United States is now importing 60 percent (4) of its crude oil  needs? Will the United States have to import even more oil due to Russian oil production in the United States?
  3. Sixty percent (5) of the Russian export economy depends upon oil. Russian onshore oil fields in Siberia are declining. Further, Russia lacks deep water drilling technology that they expect to receive from ExxonMobil as part of that Arctic oil deal. What will happen to that American-Russia Arctic oil arrangement when technology transfer from ExxonMobil to Rosneft is completed?  At that point, Russia will have what they need, both technology and access to that Arctic oil. Will ExxonMobil then be expelled from Russia?
  4. Under the Arctic oil arrangement, Russia will become the first non-ally to acquire U.S. oil fields. What if the President or Congress objects to this arrangement? If the United States balks, Russia might remind the United States that it receives 23 percent (6) of its uranium imports from Russia.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

About Dr. Everson

Prior to forming this SBIR consultant practice, Dr. Jeffrey Everson was director of business development for QinetiQ North America’s Technology Solutions Group (previously Foster-Miller, Inc.).

Dr. Everson has won and been the principal investigator for several SBIR programs, including a Phase I program for NASA, a Phase I project for the U.S. Air Force, and Phase I and II contracts from the U.S. Department of Transportation. For the Phase II program, he received a Tibbetts Award for exemplifying the best in SBIR achievement.

Previously Dr. Everson held senior scientist positions at Battelle Memorial Institute, The Analytic Sciences Corporation (TASC), Honeywell Electro Optics Systems Division, and Itek Optical Systems Division.

He holds a PhD in physics from Boston College and a MS/BS in physics from Northeastern University.


For more information about how JHEverson Consulting can help your company with its SBIR and STTR proposals, please contact Jeff Everson.

JHEverson Consulting is based in the Boston area but consults for clients throughout North America. It also is supported by affiliated consultants.